Looking at all Hispanics together, these women are missing nearly 19% of the babies that would have been born from 2008-2016, or about 2.2 million births, as their age-adjusted fertility rates have fallen from 2.85 births per woman to just 2.1, and continue to decline. In racial or ethnic terms, America’s “Baby Bust” is kinda, sorta, a little bit racist: it’s hammered Native Americans and Hispanics particularly hard, and hit even African Americans harder than whites generally, and certainly harder than non-Hispanic whites.īut the “white” fertility figure is a bit misleading, as it includes most Hispanics, who have historically had much higher birth rates than non-Hispanic whites. Asians experienced a less severe decline, but their fertility was somewhat lower to start with. Black fertility declined from 2.15 births per woman to 1.89, while white fertility fell from 2.14 to 1.82. Then come African Americans, who are missing 9.6% of expected births, or about 700,000 births, which is only slightly more severe than whites, who are missing 9.3%, or about 3.2 million births. It’s unclear exactly why Native American fertility has fallen so quickly and why it is so low, but they are indisputably the hardest-hit race in the fertility declines of the last 10 years. American Indians and Alaska Natives have it worst among racial groups, having lost a whopping 15% of expected fertility from 2008 to 2016, or about 83,000 births, with total fertility rates falling from 1.62 births per woman to a shockingly low 1.23.
The deficit varies across racial and ethnic groups. From 2008 to 2016, the deficit turns out to be between 4.1 and 4.6 million missing babies: basically, an entire year’s worth or more of childbearing vanished. If we take age-specific birth rates from the peak-fertility year of 2007 and apply them to each age cohort in 2008-2016, the most recent complete data, we can create a counterfactual scenario of how many babies would have been born if age-adjusted fertility rates had not fallen after 2007. That’s because the decline in fertility has been far greater among minorities than among non-Hispanic whites. It’s true that some people in the right wing have flirted dangerously close to, and sometimes engaged in, the kind of racialized thinking that has tarred pro-fertility initiatives throughout the 20 th century, complaining about “ other peoples’ babies,” or quietly suggesting that if African Americans have fewer kids, maybe that’s a good thing.Īt the end of the day, though, racists on the right are wrong (and comparatively few in number), but so are the progressives who assume that calls for more babies are racially driven. And, one question I find the most perplexing, is this some underhanded racist argument that white people need to pick up the pace of baby-making to out-compete minorities? fertility has any appreciable impact on carbon emissions.
Is this some science-denying attempt to ignore climate change? Again, no in fact, no plausible trajectory of U.S. In my experience, progressives tend to be more hesitant: is this a back-door argument to keep women out of the workplace? No in fact, there’s robust empirical evidence most women want more kids. When it comes to discussions about declining fertility, conservatives tend to “get it” right away: not having a next generation, or having a far smaller one, will cause problems down the line. Preliminary data from several states suggest these trends are likely to continue in 2017. Births to never-married women are down more than births to ever-married women: age-adjusted marital fertility is down 14% since 2007, while age-adjusted never-married fertility is down 21%, as of 2016.
Fertility declines increasingly seem to be about much more than just postponed fertility, or else these women must be planning to have some very fertile 40s.Īt least through 2016, this trend appeared to be mostly driven by changes in marital status. Since 2007, fertility has fallen the most for the youngest women, but in the last year, declines have set in for women in their 30s as well. The United States has experienced a remarkable slump in fertility over the last several years, as I’ve explained elsewhere. These are low numbers: births were as high as 4.31 million in 2007, and the total fertility rate was 2.08 kids back then. indicates about 3.85 million births in 2017 and a total fertility rate of about 1.76 births per women. The 2017 provisional estimate of fertility for the entire U.S. The United States just hit a 40-year low in its fertility rate, according to numbers just released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
0 kommentar(er)
